Saturday, August 9, 2008

Funny Program In A Birthday

End riddle number 2



Ce tableau me Represent ... yeah, yeah.

Iphigénie Comme, comme Polyxena, j'irai volontairement au sacrifice. J'ai d'abord think representer mon âme d'état actuel par une oeuvre ingénument kitsch intitulée "The Aveu" corn lurks could lead to misinterpretation (the person who confesses is visibly pregnant) and I found preferable to incarnate in the scene above, I prefer to die aesthetically and the anonymous author of Contemporary Vien this "Sacrifice of Iphigenia" nevertheless a sense of color and a good hand.
At least I hoped until the last moment intervention of a huntress goddess, whose arm I draw firm to a warmer sky, leaving the animal at the stake who will replace me under the knife or ( and?) under the ax (the holy water that will, if not too cold ...).

Puzzle totally off topic: I have often wondered, about the sad fate of the daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra: "but if Diane feels the need to put a deer instead of Iphigenia is that after the sacrifice Iphigenia was to be eaten !? ". grécisant None of my knowledge has ever wanted, or knew, or could honestly answer that question. Here also, everything seems ready to cook ... If Iphigenia must die and basta, it was enough to remove it, at most, not to offend those who had made the trip, Diane could leave a letter ("Excuse me, I needed it to wash my hair" or something similar), or she could not leave something like a laptop damage technologically outdated for 24 hours, but why replace it with an animal for food, why? To avoid inadvertently changing the menu. Everybody was not a vegetarian in Mycenaean. And why

ME IF I am willing to devote myself to the sacrificial knife? By remorse.

I am mistaken, misunderstanding, I was wrong and I am bewildered, I was wrong (I also roamed) I am deluded, misguided, I was blinded, deceived, lured, I mixed the paint brushes, confused, confused ... verification of dates, due to the insistence by Pia offered me (in response to my last question) the name of Madame de Pompadour gave me, after some simple cross, track error. Anyway ...
Madame du Barry is NOT the dedicatee of the work. Stage directions attached to the wrong table on a book in 1926 mystified me. But Madame de Pompadour, I add at once, is not more than the poor countess and fact nobody seems to know where was the painting between the end of the Show (October 1763) and the year 1788, when the picture became the property of the Duke de Cosse Brissac, who offered it to his mistress ... Madame du Barry, along with her "during" entitled "Love fleeing slavery" whose reproduction is visible on the blogging (Message of July 19, 2008) and that the Duke had run into by Vien 1787-1788.
Madame du Barry did not become the mistress of Louis XV before 1766-67 and before arriving at this "position" (or if you want to this "job" ... these "functions" ?) she probably did not have access to the works listed as a painter Vien was at that time. There is also a detail-erotic culture - which I will discuss in the next post - which prevents them from thinking that the picture could have been produced with the intention of offering it to the Marquise de Pompadour. But there are few examples of the great painters of this century have executed large tables without first ensuring they are sold. Who commissioned or acquired "The market loves" in 1763? It will remain this mystery, because even the Reunion des Musees Nationaux de France does not know.

Will I be in a few days in New York where I get Surely after following the river Serchio floated on the Tyrrhenian Sea, past the Strait of Gibraltar and across the Atlantic on my bed turned into a ship by the waves of bitter tears I shed? Or I'll finish in the stomach of any one of my readers?

you later, so (I am talking only to my readers of the New World).
Your C.

0 comments:

Post a Comment