The image here shows the section "personal information" - the world-appelons avatar - n'est qu'un détail d'une Esquisse preparatio au tableau que je joins à ce texte. Bien que réduit, The chart now appears in its entirety. You can not analyze the brushstroke, hand of the painter, but I'll give you some clues ... until a visitor cunning, obstinate and / or grown in discovering and tell us the origin, subject and author. Watch the costume of our subject. It is more theatrical than princely: along shawll (that's how they wrote the word shawl jsuqe circa 1830) of amaranth red cashmere turban and matching were certainly fashionable in years but the veil of the Consulate escaping, and the scenery even with her ample draperies have something scenic. Another clue: the handkerchief that the young woman holds in her left hand.
Ecco il ritratto di ... ? E chi l'ha Dipinto?
cha It appears in the "personal information" - call it my avatar - is nothing more than an outline of the picture I have added to this second post . The picture is full but that will not get you judge by ridotissimo hand and brush strokes. I will give some clues ... hoping cunning, obstinacy and / or culture of some visitors that will include in its commentary the name of the person represented and that of the painter ...
Here: First, look closely at the clothing of the young woman . The long shawll cashmere (in color between the brick el ' amarante ) very upset and went out of fashion during the years of the Consulate (1799-1804) but the veil that goes down and the scenario dall'acconciatura majestically draped behind him, there appear to be very dramatic? Another clue (I'm generous) is the handkerchief that she held in her left hand.
Who painted this picture was French, famous in his time (and today), had (for political reasons) away from France. He has painted celebrities in Naples, Rome, Vienna, Moscow, Berlin, London ... and not giving you the full list ... intentionally. So? To you. Your C.
0 comments:
Post a Comment